05 June, 2019
Return Oriented Programming on ARM (32-bit)
Making stack-based exploitation great again!
Before we start anything, you’re expected to know the basics of ARM assembly to follow along. I highly recommend Azeria’s series on ARM Assembly Basics. Once you’re comfortable with it, proceed with the next bit — environment setup.
Setup
Since we’re working with the ARM architecture, there are two options to go forth with:
- Emulate — head over to qemu.org/download and install QEMU. And then download and extract the ARMv6 Debian Stretch image from one of the links here. The scripts found inside should be self-explanatory.
- Use actual ARM hardware, like an RPi.
For debugging and disassembling, we’ll be using plain old gdb
, but you
may use radare2
, IDA or anything else, really. All of which can be
trivially installed.
Finally, the binary we’ll be using in this exercise is Billy Ellis’ roplevel2.
Compile it:
$ gcc roplevel2.c -o rop2
With that out of the way, here’s a quick run down of what ROP actually is.
A primer on ROP
ROP or Return Oriented Programming is a modern exploitation technique that’s used to bypass protections like the NX bit (no-execute bit) and code sigining. In essence, no code in the binary is actually modified and the entire exploit is crafted out of pre-existing artifacts within the binary, known as gadgets.
A gadget is essentially a small sequence of code (instructions), ending with
a ret
, or a return instruction. In our case, since we’re dealing with ARM
code, there is no ret
instruction but rather a pop {pc}
or a bx lr
.
These gadgets are chained together by jumping (returning) from one onto the other
to form what’s called as a ropchain. At the end of a ropchain,
there’s generally a call to system()
, to acheive code execution.
In practice, the process of executing a ropchain is something like this:
- confirm the existence of a stack-based buffer overflow
- identify the offset at which the instruction pointer gets overwritten
- locate the addresses of the gadgets you wish to use
- craft your input keeping in mind the stack’s layout, and chain the addresses of your gadgets
LiveOverflow has a beautiful video where he explains ROP using “weird machines”. Check it out, it might be just what you needed for that “aha!” moment :)
Still don’t get it? Don’t fret, we’ll look at actual exploit code in a bit and hopefully that should put things into perspective.
Exploring our binary
Start by running it, and entering any arbitrary string. On entering a fairly large string, say, “AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA”, we see a segmentation fault occur.
Now, open it up in gdb
and look at the functions inside it.
There are three functions that are of importance here, main
, winner
and
gadget
. Disassembling the main
function:
We see a buffer of 16 bytes being created (sub sp, sp, #16
), and some calls
to puts()
/printf()
and scanf()
. Looks like winner
and gadget
are
never actually called.
Disassembling the gadget
function:
This is fairly simple, the stack is being initialized by push
ing {r11}
,
which is also the frame pointer (fp
). What’s interesting is the pop {r0, pc}
instruction in the middle. This is a gadget.
We can use this to control what goes into r0
and pc
. Unlike in x86 where
arguments to functions are passed on the stack, in ARM the registers r0
to r3
are used for this. So this gadget effectively allows us to pass arguments to
functions using r0
, and subsequently jumping to them by passing its address
in pc
. Neat.
Moving on to the disassembly of the winner
function: