pages/blog/python-for-re-1.md (view raw)
1---
2template: text.html
3title: Python for Reverse Engineering #1: ELF Binaries
4subtitle: Building your own disassembly tooling for — that’s right — fun and profit
5date: 2019-02-08
6---
7
8While solving complex reversing challenges, we often use established tools like radare2 or IDA for disassembling and debugging. But there are times when you need to dig in a little deeper and understand how things work under the hood.
9
10Rolling your own disassembly scripts can be immensely helpful when it comes to automating certain processes, and eventually build your own homebrew reversing toolchain of sorts. At least, that’s what I’m attempting anyway.
11
12### Setup
13
14As the title suggests, you’re going to need a Python 3 interpreter before
15anything else. Once you’ve confirmed beyond reasonable doubt that you do,
16in fact, have a Python 3 interpreter installed on your system, run
17
18```console
19$ pip install capstone pyelftools
20```
21
22where `capstone` is the disassembly engine we’ll be scripting with and `pyelftools` to help parse ELF files.
23
24With that out of the way, let’s start with an example of a basic reversing
25challenge.
26
27```c
28/* chall.c */
29
30#include <stdio.h>
31#include <stdlib.h>
32#include <string.h>
33
34int main() {
35 char *pw = malloc(9);
36 pw[0] = 'a';
37 for(int i = 1; i <= 8; i++){
38 pw[i] = pw[i - 1] + 1;
39 }
40 pw[9] = '\0';
41 char *in = malloc(10);
42 printf("password: ");
43 fgets(in, 10, stdin); // 'abcdefghi'
44 if(strcmp(in, pw) == 0) {
45 printf("haha yes!\n");
46 }
47 else {
48 printf("nah dude\n");
49 }
50}
51```
52
53
54Compile it with GCC/Clang:
55
56```console
57$ gcc chall.c -o chall.elf
58```
59
60
61### Scripting
62
63For starters, let’s look at the different sections present in the binary.
64
65```python
66# sections.py
67
68from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
69
70with open('./chall.elf', 'rb') as f:
71 e = ELFFile(f)
72 for section in e.iter_sections():
73 print(hex(section['sh_addr']), section.name)
74```
75
76
77This script iterates through all the sections and also shows us where it’s loaded. This will be pretty useful later. Running it gives us
78
79```console
80› python sections.py
810x238 .interp
820x254 .note.ABI-tag
830x274 .note.gnu.build-id
840x298 .gnu.hash
850x2c0 .dynsym
860x3e0 .dynstr
870x484 .gnu.version
880x4a0 .gnu.version_r
890x4c0 .rela.dyn
900x598 .rela.plt
910x610 .init
920x630 .plt
930x690 .plt.got
940x6a0 .text
950x8f4 .fini
960x900 .rodata
970x924 .eh_frame_hdr
980x960 .eh_frame
990x200d98 .init_array
1000x200da0 .fini_array
1010x200da8 .dynamic
1020x200f98 .got
1030x201000 .data
1040x201010 .bss
1050x0 .comment
1060x0 .symtab
1070x0 .strtab
1080x0 .shstrtab
109```
110
111
112Most of these aren’t relevant to us, but a few sections here are to be noted. The `.text` section contains the instructions (opcodes) that we’re after. The `.data` section should have strings and constants initialized at compile time. Finally, the `.plt` which is the Procedure Linkage Table and the `.got`, the Global Offset Table. If you’re unsure about what these mean, read up on the ELF format and its internals.
113
114Since we know that the `.text` section has the opcodes, let’s disassemble the binary starting at that address.
115
116```python
117# disas1.py
118
119from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
120from capstone import *
121
122with open('./bin.elf', 'rb') as f:
123 elf = ELFFile(f)
124 code = elf.get_section_by_name('.text')
125 ops = code.data()
126 addr = code['sh_addr']
127 md = Cs(CS_ARCH_X86, CS_MODE_64)
128 for i in md.disasm(ops, addr):
129 print(f'0x{i.address:x}:\t{i.mnemonic}\t{i.op_str}')
130```
131
132
133The code is fairly straightforward (I think). We should be seeing this, on running
134
135```console
136› python disas1.py | less
1370x6a0: xor ebp, ebp
1380x6a2: mov r9, rdx
1390x6a5: pop rsi
1400x6a6: mov rdx, rsp
1410x6a9: and rsp, 0xfffffffffffffff0
1420x6ad: push rax
1430x6ae: push rsp
1440x6af: lea r8, [rip + 0x23a]
1450x6b6: lea rcx, [rip + 0x1c3]
1460x6bd: lea rdi, [rip + 0xe6]
147**0x6c4: call qword ptr [rip + 0x200916]**
1480x6ca: hlt
149... snip ...
150```
151
152
153The line in bold is fairly interesting to us. The address at `[rip + 0x200916]` is equivalent to `[0x6ca + 0x200916]`, which in turn evaluates to `0x200fe0`. The first `call` being made to a function at `0x200fe0`? What could this function be?
154
155For this, we will have to look at **relocations**. Quoting [linuxbase.org](http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/elf/gabi4+/ch4.reloc.html)
156> Relocation is the process of connecting symbolic references with symbolic definitions. For example, when a program calls a function, the associated call instruction must transfer control to the proper destination address at execution. Relocatable files must have “relocation entries’’ which are necessary because they contain information that describes how to modify their section contents, thus allowing executable and shared object files to hold the right information for a process’s program image.
157
158To try and find these relocation entries, we write a third script.
159
160```python
161# relocations.py
162
163import sys
164from elftools.elf.elffile import ELFFile
165from elftools.elf.relocation import RelocationSection
166
167with open('./chall.elf', 'rb') as f:
168 e = ELFFile(f)
169 for section in e.iter_sections():
170 if isinstance(section, RelocationSection):
171 print(f'{section.name}:')
172 symbol_table = e.get_section(section['sh_link'])
173 for relocation in section.iter_relocations():
174 symbol = symbol_table.get_symbol(relocation['r_info_sym'])
175 addr = hex(relocation['r_offset'])
176 print(f'{symbol.name} {addr}')
177```
178
179
180Let’s run through this code real quick. We first loop through the sections, and check if it’s of the type `RelocationSection`. We then iterate through the relocations from the symbol table for each section. Finally, running this gives us
181
182```console
183› python relocations.py
184.rela.dyn:
185 0x200d98
186 0x200da0
187 0x201008
188_ITM_deregisterTMCloneTable 0x200fd8
189**__libc_start_main 0x200fe0**
190__gmon_start__ 0x200fe8
191_ITM_registerTMCloneTable 0x200ff0
192__cxa_finalize 0x200ff8
193stdin 0x201010
194.rela.plt:
195puts 0x200fb0
196printf 0x200fb8
197fgets 0x200fc0
198strcmp 0x200fc8
199malloc 0x200fd0
200```
201
202
203Remember the function call at `0x200fe0` from earlier? Yep, so that was a call to the well known `__libc_start_main`. Again, according to [linuxbase.org](http://refspecs.linuxbase.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-generic/LSB-generic/baselib---libc-start-main-.html)
204> The `__libc_start_main()` function shall perform any necessary initialization of the execution environment, call the *main* function with appropriate arguments, and handle the return from `main()`. If the `main()` function returns, the return value shall be passed to the `exit()` function.
205
206And its definition is like so
207
208```c
209int __libc_start_main(int *(main) (int, char * *, char * *),
210int argc, char * * ubp_av,
211void (*init) (void),
212void (*fini) (void),
213void (*rtld_fini) (void),
214void (* stack_end));
215```
216
217
218Looking back at our disassembly
219
220```
2210x6a0: xor ebp, ebp
2220x6a2: mov r9, rdx
2230x6a5: pop rsi
2240x6a6: mov rdx, rsp
2250x6a9: and rsp, 0xfffffffffffffff0
2260x6ad: push rax
2270x6ae: push rsp
2280x6af: lea r8, [rip + 0x23a]
2290x6b6: lea rcx, [rip + 0x1c3]
230**0x6bd: lea rdi, [rip + 0xe6]**
2310x6c4: call qword ptr [rip + 0x200916]
2320x6ca: hlt
233... snip ...
234```
235
236
237but this time, at the `lea` or Load Effective Address instruction, which loads some address `[rip + 0xe6]` into the `rdi` register. `[rip + 0xe6]` evaluates to `0x7aa` which happens to be the address of our `main()` function! How do I know that? Because `__libc_start_main()`, after doing whatever it does, eventually jumps to the function at `rdi`, which is generally the `main()` function. It looks something like this
238
239![](https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/800/0*oQA2MwHjhzosF8ZH.png)
240
241To see the disassembly of `main`, seek to `0x7aa` in the output of the script we’d written earlier (`disas1.py`).
242
243From what we discovered earlier, each `call` instruction points to some function which we can see from the relocation entries. So following each `call` into their relocations gives us this
244
245```
246printf 0x650
247fgets 0x660
248strcmp 0x670
249malloc 0x680
250```
251
252
253Putting all this together, things start falling into place. Let me highlight the key sections of the disassembly here. It’s pretty self-explanatory.
254
255```
2560x7b2: mov edi, 0xa ; 10
2570x7b7: call 0x680 ; malloc
258```
259
260
261The loop to populate the `*pw` string
262
263```
2640x7d0: mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - 0x14]
2650x7d3: cdqe
2660x7d5: lea rdx, [rax - 1]
2670x7d9: mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 0x10]
2680x7dd: add rax, rdx
2690x7e0: movzx eax, byte ptr [rax]
2700x7e3: lea ecx, [rax + 1]
2710x7e6: mov eax, dword ptr [rbp - 0x14]
2720x7e9: movsxd rdx, eax
2730x7ec: mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 0x10]
2740x7f0: add rax, rdx
2750x7f3: mov edx, ecx
2760x7f5: mov byte ptr [rax], dl
2770x7f7: add dword ptr [rbp - 0x14], 1
2780x7fb: cmp dword ptr [rbp - 0x14], 8
2790x7ff: jle 0x7d0
280```
281
282
283And this looks like our `strcmp()`
284
285```
2860x843: mov rdx, qword ptr [rbp - 0x10] ; *in
2870x847: mov rax, qword ptr [rbp - 8] ; *pw
2880x84b: mov rsi, rdx
2890x84e: mov rdi, rax
2900x851: call 0x670 ; strcmp
2910x856: test eax, eax ; is = 0?
2920x858: jne 0x868 ; no? jump to 0x868
2930x85a: lea rdi, [rip + 0xae] ; "haha yes!"
2940x861: call 0x640 ; puts
2950x866: jmp 0x874
2960x868: lea rdi, [rip + 0xaa] ; "nah dude"
2970x86f: call 0x640 ; puts
298```
299
300
301I’m not sure why it uses `puts` here? I might be missing something; perhaps `printf` calls `puts`. I could be wrong. I also confirmed with radare2 that those locations are actually the strings “haha yes!” and “nah dude”.
302
303**Update**: It's because of compiler optimization. A `printf()` (in this case) is seen as a bit overkill, and hence gets simplified to a `puts()`.
304
305### Conclusion
306
307Wew, that took quite some time. But we’re done. If you’re a beginner, you might find this extremely confusing, or probably didn’t even understand what was going on. And that’s okay. Building an intuition for reading and grokking disassembly comes with practice. I’m no good at it either.
308
309All the code used in this post is here: [https://github.com/icyphox/asdf/tree/master/reversing-elf](https://github.com/icyphox/asdf/tree/master/reversing-elf)
310
311Ciao for now, and I’ll see ya in #2 of this series — PE binaries. Whenever that is.